|
|
This archive, divided in thematic sections, contains the Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ) for the most general aspects on the MAC
system operation. We at Magaldi will be pleased, in case you
have further questions to ask, to answer you directly: contact
us
Cooling air process and effects on boiler performance
The temperature profile at the discharge depends
on many parameters; such as the ash rate, the ash grain size
distribution, the length and speed of the MAC extractor etc.
Therefore, each MAC system is designed according to specific
temperature requirements of the downstream process. According
to a normal design, the temperature of the ash at the primary
crusher discharge is in the range 100-300° C , while the external
temperature of the MAC casing is kept at 60° C.
Large lumps are difficult to cool: even if
the outer surface gets cooled rapidly, the core usually remains
hot. However, the crusher (after the MAC extractor discharge)
reduces the size of any lump to less than 75 mm [3 inch],
resulting in a quick cooling during the further processing
downstream the primary crusher.
No. The MAC system is applied in balanced
draft boilers and uses the negative pressure inside the boiler.
The MAC extractor is in direct communication with the combustion
chamber, so a negative pressure is obtained inside the MAC
system also. This negative pressure provides the motive force
for drafting cooling air from the ambient into the MAC extractor
through special air inlet valves on the casing.
Yes. Depending on design requirements, the
amount of air flowing into the MAC system can either be kept
constant or regulated. If the cooling air quantity has to
be kept constant, the air inlet valves are fixed and the quantity
of cooling air is equal to the design value (i.e. the maximum
quantity that may be required). If the cooling air inflow
is regulated, a control system is applied with dampers on
the air inlet valves, which are regulated as a function of
the required cooling capacity (which depends mainly on the
ash rate and temperature). In this way, the quantity of air
flowing into the MAC system is minimized continuously.
No. It has been amply verified with tests,
that the cooling air coming from the MAC does not affect the
formation of NOx, the flue gas composition or the unburned
carbon content of the fly ash. Firstly, this can be explained
by the simple fact that the amount of cooling air required
in the MAC system is very low: normally, it does not exceed
1.5% of the total combustion air flow to the boiler. Furthermore,
the cooling air gets heated while cooling the ash in the MAC
system, and once it flows up into the boiler, it has reached
a temperature of 300-400 °C [570-750 °F]. Therefore, it acts
exactly as combustion air for the furnace.
No. Cooling air needed for the MAC system
is not additional air, but part of the main combustion air.
So, the amount of combustion air to the burners can actually
be decreased. For example, if 1 % of the combustion air is
the cooling air needed for the MAC system , air to the burners
can be reduced to 99 % of the total combustion air.
This applies only to the case of retrofit
of a MAC system in a boiler without any air heater bypass
for flue gas temperature control. For new boilers, any flue
gas temperature increase due to the MAC system can be avoided
by adequate air heater design. In the case of retrofit of
a MAC system in a boiler equipped with air heater bypass control,
the flow rate through the bypass can be appropriately adjusted
to ensure that there is no increase in flue gas temperature.
Even in the case of a slight increase of flue gas temperature
after retrofitting a MAC system, there will be a net boiler
efficiency increase with the MAC system, because the decrease
in efficiency due to a higher flue gas temperature is more
than offset by the recovery of the larger part of the energy
contained in the bottom ash that is normally completely lost
with a wet bottom ash system. In all cases, the balance is
in favour of the MAC system. For a more detailed explanation,
see the paper "DRY BOTTOM ASH REMOVAL - ASH COOLING VS.
BOILER EFFICIENCY EFFECTS".
Large ash lumps
No. By its special design, the Superbelt has
a fine characteristic to absorb huge impact loads. Furthermore,
under the boiler throat the supporting rollers are closely
spaced in order to spread the impact over a large area.
No, as is explained in the answer to the previous
question. Nevertheless, if the fall of large ash lumps is
very frequent, it may be preferable to avoid the direct impact
of such lumps onto the Superbelt. This can be obtained by
an asymmetric design of the bottom ash hopper, whereby the
MAC extractor and the boiler throat axes are offset. In that
case, large lumps would first fall on the sloped hopper walls.
The MAC extractor is designed to ensure that
anything that passes through the boiler throat, also passes
through the MAC extractor. The width of the Superbelt is 1200
mm [4 ft] whereas the height of the casing above the belt
is typically 1000 mm [3’3”], whereas the boiler throat opening
width is usually about 1 meter [3,3 ft]. This means that any
big ash lump falling from the boiler can be conveyed through
the MAC extractor to the primary crusher. The outlet size
from the crusher is sufficiently small to enable further ash
processing in downstream equipment.
Maintenance & Operation
Thanks to its sturdy design, the MAC system
is an extremely user-friendly and low-maintenance system compared
to the wet conventional bottom ash handling systems. Since
there is no friction between the belt and the ash handled,
wear is negligible, and the only regular maintenance activity
is the lubrication of the roller’s bearings (typically once
every 3 months), which can be done with the system running.
Any extraordinary maintenance can include the replacement
of a roller’s bearing in case of failure (however unlikely);
also this can be done with the system in operation.
All other maintenance activities can be done during scheduled
outages; these include replacement of wear parts of spill
chain and crusher and downstream equipment, if any (e.g. hammer
mill, pneumatic system, ash conditioner etc.).
The Magaldi Superbelt with its unique mesh
and pan arrangement is very sturdy and extremely dependable
compared to the wet conventional bottom ash handling systems.
The mesh is based on a damage tolerant design in order to
ensure that even if one or more wires break, the belt can
keep on operating till the next planned stoppage of the plant.
In more than 2,8 million hours of cumulative operation of
all the MAC systems installed, till date there has not been
a single instance of a sudden need for replacement of the
belt or even a piece of the belt. From the 20-year long experience
with almost a hundred of MAC systems in operation now, it
follows that the average expected life of the Superbelt is
at least 10 years, and Magaldi gives a warranty on the belt
of 5 years.
So, any repair or replacement of the belt can be executed
during planned outages. Replacement of the entire belt can
be done in 8-10 hours, replacement of a single piece would
need about 4 hours.
Refractory spalling due to thermal shocks
by water splashing is a very common phenomenon in water impounded
hoppers. In the MAC system, on the other hand, the hopper
is dry and lined with the adequate quality of refractory,
so no spalling at all occurs.
General
Most MAC extractors that are installed on
the ground have an inclined section, in order to reach the
required height at the discharge point without the need for
excavation. If there is a pit where the crusher and the pick-up
point for the other downstream equipment can be installed,
the MAC extractor can be horizontal.
Backslide of ash on the inclined section of the Superbelt
depends on ash properties (e.g. size distribution and natural
repose angle) and operating characteristics (e.g., belt speed)
), but it occurs very rarely. In general, for inclinations
up to 30 ° this risk is not present. If for higher inclinations
a risk of backslide is expected, transversal cleats may be
installed on the Superbelt.
The application of bottom doors depends on
several operational, geometrical and economical factors. Principally,
the bottom doors provide a redundancy of the system, because
they make it possible to separate the MAC system from the
internal boiler atmosphere and store ash inside the hopper.
In this way, it is possible to operate the MAC system in a
discontinuous mode as a default even if the ash production
is very high. After the storage interval is finished, the
ash stored inside the hopper can be extracted in a staggered
way by opening the doors in a sequence, pair-by-pair. In this
way, the tension on the belt during extraction is minimized
and the cooling optimized.
If on the other hand, no bottom doors are present, the ash
is stored directly on the Superbelt during stoppage of the
MAC extractor, which does not present any problem. The main
implication is that after restarting the system, the whole
volume of accumulated ash is extracted at once, which leads
to a higher tension on the belt and a less effective cooling
of the ash. If these factors may be critical, which is more
likely for large boilers or boilers with a large bottom ash
production, it may be preferable to operate the MAC system
normally in a continuous mode if no bottom doors are present.
On the other hand, without bottom doors and hopper the MAC
system requires much less space, which means that it can fit
even under boilers with a very low clearance without the need
for excavation. This can be a major advantage especially for
small boilers and boilers with a low bottom ash production,
where a MAC system without bottom doors can be operated discontinuously
just as well.
In any case the overall reason is that the
MAC system contributes to an improved boiler performance and
to reduced costs related to the bottom ash handling. Specific
reasons include the following:
- the elimination of water for ash cooling & transportation,
which means savings on water consumption, no production of
contaminated waste water, no need for ponds or dewatering
bins, no risk of ice formation etc.
- the recovery of energy from the bottom ash to the boiler,
and the significant burn-out of unburned carbon in the bottom
ash, leading to an increased boiler efficiency
- the possibility for the re-use and sales of the dry bottom
ash to other industries, e.g. the cement industry, instead
of having to pay for disposal of the ash
- the possibility to simplify the overall ash handling by
the integration of the bottom ash handling system with the
fly ash handling system, thanks to the bottom ash pulverizers
in the MAC system
- the higher dependability of the system, which can lead to
an improved boiler availability
- lower operating & maintenance costs, thanks to the absence
of high-wear components, the low power consumption (no high-power
pumps, motors or fans), the fully automatic operation etc.
There are many advantages in a direct comparison
between a MAC and a SSC. The first is the obvious elimination
in the MAC system of the water in the ash cooling and process,
differently from SSC, which is requiring a certain quantity
of water. Also to be considered is the complete elimination
of water related equipment, like pumps, pipelines, filters,
heat exchangers etc.
Reliability is also a main advantage of the MAC versus the
SSC : the availability factor of the MAC is much higher than
the SSC, due to the intrinsic MAC belt damage tolerant design,
while the SSC chain could break without any warning.
Another advantage of the MAC is the recovery of energy which
in a wet system is lost. Almost 90% of the energy which is
lost in the water of a wet system can be recovered by the
MAC, leading to an increase of the boiler efficiency.
Maintenance costs are also in favour of the MAC, if compared
with an SSC, and, last but not the least, the dry ash obtained
from the MAC system is a material that can be more easily
sold (e.g. in the cement industry), other than the wet ash
obtained from a SSC system.
|